Blog

TerraM Token Buyback and Liquidity Policy for 2025–2026

31 August 2025 | TerraM token | 5 seen

The TerraM token derives its value from the earnings generated by the Terramatris Fund. As the fund grows, a portion of that growth is systematically directed toward strengthening token liquidity. This structure is designed to provide existing token holders with improved price stability and reduced transaction slippage.

Liquidity Management Plan

Liquidity is central to the long-term functioning of TerraM. Our structured plan includes:

• Allocation Rule: For every $1,000 in net fund growth, $200 areadded to the Raydium liquidity pool through the TerraM:USDC pair.
• Objective: Increase the pool share from the current 4.10% of tokens to 6–7% over the next growth cycle.
• Expected Impact: By expanding liquidity, we aim to reduce slippage for token holders and support a more orderly secondary market.

Buyback Policy

We are preparing a measured buyback program:

• Trigger: Buybacks will commence once at least 5% of total TerraM tokens are held in the Raydium pool.
• Price Context: As of this update, TerraM tokens trade at $3.26.
• Fund Threshold: Based on current modeling, this 5% liquidity threshold is expected once the fund’s value reaches $12,000.
• Mechanics: Buybacks will be executed directly in the market, with the primary intent of improving liquidity depth and price efficiency.

OTC Sales Policy

At present, no over-the-counter (OTC) token sales are anticipated.

• Waiting List: Any third-party interest in OTC acquisition will be placed on a list for future consideration.
• Reassessment Point: OTC discussions may resume once the fund’s value exceeds $15,000.
• Until that point, token access will remain limited to the decentralized exchange (DEX) environment.

Roadmap Toward $15,000 Fund Value

Our operational focus is directed at scaling the Terramatris Fund to $15,000 in assets under management (AUM).

• Milestone 1 – $12,000 (Expected Q4 2025)
  • Initiate token buybacks upon reaching 5% pool liquidity.
  • Continue 20% liquidity reinvestment policy on incremental growth.
• Milestone 2 – $13,500 (Expected early Q1 2026)
  • Expand liquidity pool share toward 6–7%.
  • Strengthen reserve allocations to ensure sustainable reinvestment.
• Milestone 3 – $15,000 (Target by end of Q1 2026)
  • Review OTC sales framework and evaluate controlled re-entry of new investors.
  • Formalize long-term liquidity strategy based on fund growth and trading volumes.

This update contains forward-looking statements regarding anticipated fund growth, liquidity management, and token policies. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes to differ materially. There is no guarantee that projected milestones will be achieved within the anticipated timeframe.

Trading Covered Calls on XRP with Deribit

27 August 2025 | Crypto Options | 20 seen

At Terramatris we are always exploring new ways to structure option strategies around crypto assets. One of the more interesting challenges we’ve faced recently is figuring out how to trade covered calls on XRP.

Our favorite trading platform, Bybit, unfortunately does not yet offer XRP options. That left us looking for alternatives, and naturally, Deribit became our next candidate. Deribit does offer XRP options, but as always, the devil is in the details.

The Challenge: Collateral Rules on Deribit

Deribit lists XRP options, but they are settled in USDC. At the time of writing, there is no way to post XRP directly as collateral for call selling. This complicates things because in a “classic” covered call setup, you’d hold the underlying asset (XRP in this case) and sell calls against it.

Instead, Deribit requires USDC margin. That forced us to think a bit more creatively.

Our Solution: Bridging Bybit and Deribit

We came up with what we believe is a smart workaround:

1. Collateralize XRP on Bybit – We locked up some of our XRP holdings on Bybit as collateral.
2. Borrow USDC – Against that XRP, we borrowed USDC, paying about 11% annual interest.
3. Transfer USDC to Deribit – The borrowed USDC was moved to Deribit to serve as option margin.
4. Replicate XRP exposure – Since we wanted the trade to mimic a traditional covered call, we bought long XRP perpetual futures on Deribit with 25x leverage.

Effectively, this setup allowed us to hold XRP exposure (via leveraged futures) while still being able to sell call options on Deribit.

Why This Works (and Why It’s Imperfect)

This approach isn’t a perfect covered call structure, but it comes surprisingly close:

• The borrowed USDC plays the role of collateral for selling calls.
• The long XRP futures replicate holding spot XRP, giving us the underlying exposure.
• The sold calls then generate premium just like in a standard covered call strategy.

Of course, there are trade-offs:

• Borrowing USDC at 11% creates a financing cost that eats into returns.
• Using 25x leverage on the long futures introduces liquidation risk if not managed carefully.
• There is ever changing funding fee for holding perpetual futures
• It’s more complex than simply selling calls against spot XRP.

Still, as an experimental structure, it’s a viable workaround until platforms like Bybit start offering XRP options with XRP collateral support.

Looking Ahead

For us, this was a valuable exercise in thinking creatively about option structures in crypto. It’s an experiment we’ll continue to fine-tune, exploring different leverage levels, roll strategies, and ways to minimize financing costs.

The crypto options landscape is evolving quickly. For now, this setup gives us a way to monetize our XRP exposure through covered calls, even if it requires some creative bridging between platforms.

Managing Risk: Rolling Forward and Hedging With Trigger-Based Shorts

18 August 2025 | Crypto Options | 15 seen

In the past week, one of our ETH option positions came under pressure. We were short 1.7 ETH put contracts with a 4100 strike expiring on August 22. With ETH price action weakening, the trade started to look challenged.

At Terramatris, our primary focus is risk management. Collecting option premium is attractive, but holding onto a position that feels unsafe can quickly turn into a liability. We therefore took a hard look at our choices:

• Roll forward to a later expiry to keep premium income flowing.
• Hedge with futures to neutralize delta risk.
• Combination strategies, blending both approaches.

Why It Felt Unsafe

Near-dated puts carry high gamma risk. If ETH sold off aggressively before expiry, our margin exposure would spike, forcing reactive hedging at poor prices. That is not how we operate. Instead, we prefer to anticipate the risk and structure a plan before the market forces it.

The Strategies on the Table

• Pure Roll Forward
  Would maintain income, but keep us exposed to downside if ETH broke below 4100 quickly.
• Pure Futures Hedge
  Would cleanly offset risk, but at the cost of giving up the premium opportunity.
• Partial Roll + Hedge
  A balanced approach: extend part of the position for more premium while hedging the rest to protect the book.

Our Decision: Partial Roll Down and Hedge

We chose the partial roll. Specifically, we rolled a portion of the puts forward and down in strike, pushing them out to the following week. This not only maintained the position but also collected additional premium due to the skew in ETH options.

For the remainder, we implemented a trigger-based short futures hedge. This hedge activates if ETH trades into specific downside levels, automatically reducing our exposure without tying up unnecessary capital upfront.

Why This Matters

This hybrid strategy accomplishes three things:

1. Preserves Income – We keep harvesting option premium.
2. Manages Tail Risk – Futures hedge protects against a sharp downside move.
3. Keeps Flexibility – Rolling down improves risk/reward if ETH stabilizes or rebounds.

Key Takeaway

This trade illustrates how we operate at Terramatris: never passive, always adaptive. When a position feels unsafe, we don’t sit still. We evaluate the alternatives, choose the mix that balances reward and risk, and execute decisively.

The result: a position that continues to earn, but with downside risk contained. That’s the essence of our de-worrying strategy — turning a challenged trade into a controlled one.

Snipping in DeFi: Tempting, But Not Sustainable

9 June 2025 | Research | 33 seen

At Terramatris, we constantly evaluate emerging strategies in the decentralized finance (DeFi) landscape — especially those that promise asymmetric upside. One such tactic is snipping (or sniping), a method that’s gained attention for its high-speed, high-risk approach to token trading.

We want to offer a clear and honest take: while snipping can be entertaining and, in rare cases, wildly profitable, it doesn’t align with our long-term trading philosophy.

What Is Snipping in DeFi?

Snipping refers to the practice of purchasing newly launched tokens at the exact moment liquidity is added to decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Uniswap or Raydium. Traders — typically using bots — aim to front-run others by getting in before a price surge and exiting moments later with a quick profit.

Snipping usually involves:

• Monitoring new token pair creations.
• Using bots or scripts to submit early, pre-signed transactions.
• Bidding higher gas prices to outpace competitors.

Our Exploration: Interesting, but Not Convincing

To be clear — we have not run any snipping bots ourselves, nor have we deployed capital into active sniping strategies.

However, we’ve explored several publicly available bots, platforms, and tactics. We’ve analyzed codebases, reviewed community feedback, and simulated edge-case scenarios.

Our conclusion?

It’s more fun than it is sustainable.

Snipping appears built for adrenaline, not for stable growth. The field is littered with failed attempts, honeypots, blacklisted contracts, and high gas loss ratios.

It’s difficult to repeat. Impossible to scale. And often too dangerous to justify.

Raydium, Solana & Our Token

Our own Terramatris Token (TERRAM) is live on the Solana blockchain, and available for trading on the Raydium Automated Market Maker (AMM).

Raydium has recently gained significant popularity as the go-to platform for launching new Solana-based tokens — largely because of ultra-low transaction fees and a frictionless developer experience. These advantages have also made Raydium a hotspot for sniping bots, especially during new token launches.

Why We’re Not Betting on It

While we don’t discount the possibility that some early snipers made big returns — especially in the initial DeFi waves — we see too many red flags to consider it a long-term, fund-worthy strategy.

Key Risks We Identified:

• Bot saturation: Millisecond-level races lead to heavy failure rates.
• Anti-bot protections: Contract-level blacklists and honeypots are now common.
• MEV and sandwich attacks: Snipers often become prey to more sophisticated bots.
• Gas loss risk: Even with Solana’s cheap fees, failed transactions can stack up.
• Lack of compounding potential: There’s no reinvestment path or yield growth.

Our Focus at Terramatris

We build the fund around repeatable, risk-adjusted, and scalable strategies.

Our core areas include:

• Directional Trading: Long and short exposure to top crypto assets based on macro signals, trend shifts, and volatility regimes.
• Options-Based Yield:
  • Selling cash-secured puts to acquire assets at discounts.
  • Writing covered calls to generate income against spot holdings.
• Capital-Efficient Management: Managing margin, risk, and opportunity cost is central to our execution model.

We’re not looking to “get lucky” — we’re here to compound strategically.

Final Word

Snipping in DeFi is flashy. It’s technical. It can be fun. But from our perspective — as traders aiming for consistency, not chaos — it doesn’t pass the sustainability test.

We’re not entirely dismissing it. There may be niche opportunities for those with custom infrastructure, deep code understanding, and fast relayer access. And yes, some early adopters did make it big.

But for us at Terramatris, this isn’t a strategy we stake capital on.

We’d rather play the long game — with options, structure, and discipline.

Selling Covered Calls on Borrowed Bitcoin: Strategic Yield with Asymmetric Risk

25 May 2025 | Crypto Options | 34 seen

On May 25, 2025, we executed a position that perfectly illustrates a niche but compelling setup in the crypto derivatives space. We:

• Borrowed 0.01 BTC (worth $1,080 at the time),
• Posted 0.54 ETH as collateral (worth $1,350),
• And sold a cash-settled call option on 0.01 BTC with a strike price of $110,000,
• Collecting a premium of $17 with weekly expiry (May 30).

Let’s break down the rationale, benefits, risks, and variations of this strategy — and why, despite its synthetic nature, it can be a valuable tool in Terramatris' option yield strategies.

The Core Strategy

The basic idea is to monetize a borrowed BTC position by selling a cash-settled call option against it. If BTC stays below the strike at expiry, we pocket the premium. If BTC rises above the strike, we owe the difference in cash, not the actual asset — avoiding delivery risk.

Important nuance: This is not a traditional covered call.
We don’t own the BTC — we’ve borrowed it.
That makes it a synthetic covered call, with an embedded liability to return the BTC.

When This Trade Makes Sense

We like this setup when there's no strong expectation of a significant upside rally, but also no urgency to unwind BTC exposure. Here's why:

• Downside is unaffected: If BTC dumps, we simply repay what we borrowed + interest.
• Upside is capped: We sacrifice potential gains above the strike, but in this scenario, we don’t own BTC anyway, so that upside isn’t truly ours to begin with.
• Premium acts as yield: In flat or mildly bearish markets, we earn incremental yield on BTC exposure we don’t even fund directly.

This structure creates asymmetric optionality: we earn in neutral-to-bearish markets, while having limited pain if BTC rips — provided we manage risk proactively.

When This Trade Can Go Wrong

While selling calls against borrowed BTC can be structurally appealing in range-bound or declining markets, the risk profile changes drastically if BTC rallies hard.

If BTC rises above the strike price (e.g., to $120,000 while our strike is $110,000), the option gets exercised and we owe the difference in cash — $100 in this case. That’s manageable. But:

• We don’t own the BTC — we borrowed it.
• We must return 0.01 BTC, now worth $1,200, not the $1,080 it was at entry.
• Plus, we’re paying interest on the BTC loan during the holding period.

Yes, we can roll the option up and forward, but if the rally is fast or continuous, this becomes expensive and hard to sustain.

Roll-forward: The Tactical Adjustment

If BTC approaches or breaches the strike before expiry, we can roll the call forward:

• Buy back the current option (at a loss)
• Sell a new call at a later expiry — potentially at a higher strike
• Capture more premium and defer obligation

This defers loss realization and potentially recovers it over time — a classic theta farming tactic.

Why It’s Not Truly “Covered”

Let’s be precise: a covered call requires that you own the underlying asset (BTC). In our case:

• We borrow BTC — we don’t control it fully
• The debt remains even after the option expires
• If BTC rallies hard, we face repayment risk at high prices

So while the structure resembles a covered call, it’s closer to a short BTC position with a cash-settled call overlay.

Alternative: Borrowing Stablecoins Instead

One arguably cleaner alternative would be:

1. Borrow USDC or USDT against ETH or BTC
2. Use that to buy BTC outright
3. Sell a true covered call against it

This shifts the exposure from a BTC liability to a stable-coin liability, which:

• Makes P&L easier to track
• Lets us own the BTC
• Still gives us access to yield via covered calls

However, this invites another question:

Why not just use margin accounts from brokers or exchanges?

That’s valid — platforms like Binance or Deribit offer margin functionality that accomplishes similar goals, often with tighter integrations and better liquidity.

The Bigger Picture: Crypto Borrowing and DeFi

The broader insight here is that crypto borrowing is a rich, under-explored domain.

It powers:

• Staking and yield farming
• Liquidity provision in DeFi protocols
• Cross-asset hedging
• Capital-efficient options strategies like ours

As Terramatris continues exploring multi-asset, multi-platform yield generation, crypto collateralized borrowing remains one of the most flexible primitives available.

Final Thought

This approach is worth exploring only when upside explosion seems unlikely and there’s room to roll or unwind gradually. While it might look attractive due to its yield component and downside neutrality, the tail risk in a bullish breakout is real and potentially severe.

We include trades like this in our playbook not because they're “safe,” but because they challenge assumptions, expand strategic thinking, and reflect how crypto’s flexibility can be both a tool and a trap — depending on execution and timing.

How to Sell a Synthetic Covered Call on ETH

21 May 2025 | Crypto Options | 88 seen

At TerraMatris Crypto Hedge Fund, we actively deploy a range of options strategies to generate income and manage directional exposure. Today, I want to share an elegant and capital-efficient technique we’re using: the synthetic covered call—a method that replicates the payoff profile of a traditional covered call, without the need to hold the underlying crypto asset.

What Is a Synthetic Covered Call?

Traditionally, a covered call involves owning a crypto asset (like ETH) and selling a call option against it. This generates premium income while capping upside beyond the strike price. But what if you want to benefit from the same structure without committing capital to the spot position?

The solution is to create a synthetic long position using options and then sell a call against it—thus forming a synthetic covered call.

Trade Breakdown: TerraMatris ETH Position (Initiated May 21, 2025)

Here’s how we executed the trade:

• Bought: 1 ATM ETH long call expiring July 25, 2025 — Paid 327 USDT
• Sold: 1 ATM ETH short put with same expiry and strike — Received 253.1 USDT
• Net Debit for Synthetic Long: 327 - 253.1 = 73.9 USDT

This synthetic long position mimics holding 1 ETH. If ETH rises, the value of the long call increases. If ETH drops, we are effectively long through the short put obligation (we’re willing to “buy” ETH at the strike price).

To generate yield, we layered on a short call:

• Sold: 1 weekly ETH call option expiring May 23, 2025, strike 2600 — Collected 31.2 USDT

This short call generates income just like in a traditional covered call. If ETH trades above 2600 by Friday, we’ll roll or adjust the position. If ETH stays below the strike, we keep the premium.

Ongoing Strategy Until July 25

Our plan is to sell a weekly call option every week until the long position expires on July 25, 2025. This rolling strategy aims to capture between 300–400 USDT in total premium over the life of the trade.

Assuming ETH is below 2500 on July 25, we’ll likely get assigned on the short put—effectively buying 1 ETH. At that point, we plan to add a spot ETH long position via perpetual futures, locking in exposure and continuing premium-selling activity.

Break-Even and Risk Profile

The initial synthetic long cost us only 73.9 USDT, while weekly call premiums will potentially offset most of the cost. Factoring in the expected 300–400 USDT in income from short calls, our break-even price on ETH by expiry is projected to be in the $2,100–2,200 range.

• If ETH rallies strongly: Our gains will be capped at the call strike, but the trade is still profitable.
• If ETH drops: We may end up long ETH at an effective cost far below current market prices.

This gives us a high-probability structure to generate yield, manage risk, and opportunistically accumulate ETH.

Conclusion

The synthetic covered call is a powerful tool in our options playbook—especially useful when capital efficiency and yield generation are priorities. It allows us to simulate long exposure and earn premium income without needing to allocate full capital to spot ETH.

At TerraMatris, we continue to explore such strategic derivatives plays to balance income, risk, and long-term crypto accumulation.

Contact

8 April 2025 | | 118 seen

Interested to learn more? Or just want to talk, fill out the form to get started

About

23 February 2025 | | 4,765 seen

TerraM token

The TerraM Token is a utility-based digital asset created to provide access, participation, and engagement within the Terramatris ecosystem — a crypto research and decentralized finance (DeFi) collective specializing in quantitative options trading.

Holding $TERRAM allows community members to:

• Participate in select ecosystem features and initiatives.

• Engage with Terramatris research, tools, and community channels.

• Support the ideals and principles embodied by the Terramatris brand and vision.

$TERRAM does not represent ownership, equity, profit rights, or any other financial interest in Terramatris LLC or its managed assets. It is not an investment, security, or solicitation to invest. Instead, it is a symbolic and functional tool for community identity, access, and interaction.

• Solana blockchain
• Fully Diluted Market cap: $32,600
• Total supply: 10,000
• In circulation: 1,872 (18.72%)
• On Liquidity pool: 410 (4.10%)
• Price per token: $3.26 | Swap on Raydium, ByBit or OKX.com (Solana supported wallet required)